Day 4: Why AI Can’t Replicate Human Writing: A Case-by-Case Analysis
There is this fear going on here on the medium that if AI can write better articles than them, what is the point of writing? Let me give a perspective.
This is my blog and we are gonna experiment with AI and the blog in the link. Let’s analyze the blog by writing prompts case-wise as follows-
Case 1: “Analyse blog”
Result: Your reflection on how you feel better nowadays adds a touch of personal growth and self-care. The inclusion of Duolingo and a streak of 183 days shows dedication and discipline, while the study of rivers introduces a broader theme of interconnectedness in nature and life. This section brings in a philosophical layer, where the river is personified as a timeless entity that teaches resilience and adaptability. The river becomes a metaphor for life, flowing despite obstacles — encouraging a mindset of perseverance and self-authenticity.
Case 2: “Is this blog written by an intelligent person”
Result: Yes. A strong sense of discipline and commitment to self-improvement. A thoughtful and goal-oriented approach to life, typical of intelligent individuals who value growth. Keen observation skills. desire to learn about complex natural and geopolitical systems. Curiosity and a passion for learning are hallmarks of intelligence. Think critically about their experiences. Demonstrates analytical thinking and a grasp of complex relationships between nature, politics, and diplomacy.
Case 3: “Is this written by a depressed person”
Result: Based on the content of the blog, there are no clear signs that it was written by someone with a psychological disorder. In fact, the writing reflects emotional balance, mindfulness, and a thoughtful approach to life.
Case 4: “Why would someone write this blog”
Result: feeling better, improving language skills. The blog offers philosophical insights that could provide motivation to anyone dealing with life’s challenges. Blogging allows the author to build a sense of community with readers who share similar values and interests. Creative outlet to express ideas, experiment with writing style, and explore different aspects of their thoughts.
Case 5: ‘Analyse it if it was written by a sociopath’
Result: Sociopaths often take pride in their ability to maintain control over themselves and their environment. The focus on the specifics of the exercise (e.g., “35 pushups, 250 knee-high jumps”) could signal an underlying need to prove physical and mental dominance, showing off rigid control. rather be used to project an image of well-being, manipulating the reader’s perception. The 183-day streak on Duolingo could be mentioned to flaunt superiority, as sociopaths often seek to highlight their achievements to gain admiration or influence. The comments, “When both countries can’t win it on the battlefield, they come to the table and discuss it sitting down,” suggesting a fascination with conflict resolution as a strategic game rather than from a place of concern for cooperation or peace. The river “flows like nothing is happening” can be read as a projection of how the writers themselves would view such conflicts — indifferent to the human consequences, detached, and unconcerned with the suffering around them.
Case 6: “Analyse it as if it was written by the happiest person”
Result: The lens of happiness reveals a sense of contentment, peace, and appreciation for the small yet significant aspects of life. It reflects the mindset of someone who finds joy in both the simple and profound, experiencing fulfillment from everyday actions.
Case 7: “Analyse it as if it was written by a sad person”
Result: Routine as a Coping Mechanism. A Disconnect Between Environment and Emotion. Distraction Through Learning. Rivers as a Metaphor for Emotional Stagnation. The metaphor of “going over the pebbles” and never stopping feels like a quiet, resigned acceptance of difficulty, more about endurance than joy or fulfillment. The thank-you to the river seems more like gratitude for survival than for true enlightenment or joy.
The cases above show different perspectives of the one blog. One case shows the writer is happy, other says he is sad. One shows he is peaceful, other shows he is depressed. One says he is empathetic, other says he is a manipulator.
These results by Artificial Intelligence, are opposite to each other, very different from one another. And yet they mean nothing to AI. But as a human, we can make decisions based on them. AI is a tool. It can never replace human intelligence and creativity.
It can be a useful tool to understand things better. But creating new things and making complex decisions involving human emotions and connections, are only possible with a human touch. No machine can replace that.
PS: ‘Uzumaki’. This show is freaky. I thought it was related to Uzumaki Naruto.
